Evolution of the IT Project Manager’s Role under Hyperautomation of Corporate Processes

Authors

  • Ievgenii Lysenko

Keywords:

hyperautomation, IT project management, operational resilience, integration delay

Abstract

The article examines how hyperautomation changes the role of the IT project manager in large corporate environments and explains the shift from manual coordination to event-driven process orchestration. The study addresses the growing complexity of distributed IT operations, stricter regulatory expectations, and the limits of managerial routines built on fragmented communication, manual checks, and dependence on individual actors. The article is designed as a conceptual paper grounded in literature on operational resilience, human error, distributed coordination, and project management, with SOAS used as an illustrative architecture rather than as a validated case study. The central contribution is a conceptual model of the IT orchestrator, a project leader who defines event logic, routing rules, validation layers, and escalation paths across interconnected systems. The analysis shows that hyperautomation changes the managerial object of work. Attention shifts toward process architecture, exception design, latent vulnerability mapping, and control of integration delay. A competency profile for the IT orchestrator is proposed. The article may be useful for researchers of digital governance, IT project managers, business process architects, and digital transformation leaders.

Author Biography

  • Ievgenii Lysenko

    IT Project Manager, PwC, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

References

[1] Y. Fan and X. Shen, “Research Regarding the Impact Mechanism of Digital Economy Development on Economic Resilience—Mediating Effect Based on Upgraded Industries,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, Art. no. 5749, 2025. doi: 10.3390/su17135749.

[2] R. M. Jacobsen, J. Wester, H. B. Djernæs, and van Berkel, “Distributed Cognition for AI-supported Remote Operations: Challenges and Research Directions,” ArXiv, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.14996.

[3] M. Arnold, M. Goldschmitt, and T. Rigotti, “Dealing with Information Overload: A Comprehensive Review,” Frontiers in Psychology Organizational Psychology, vol. 14, Art. no. 1122200, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200.

[4] J. Varajao, R. P. Marques, and A. Trigo, “Project Management Processes – Impact on the Success of Information Systems Projects,” Informatica, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 421-436, 2022. doi: 10.15388/22-INFOR488.

[5] R. Vivona, M. A. Demircioglu, and D. B. Audretsch, “The costs of collaborative innovation,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 48, pp. 873-899, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10961-022-09933-1.

[6] N. Parlov, G. Akrap, and J. Esterhajer, “Supply Chain Security and AI Risk Governance Model for Critical Infrastructure under NIS2, CER, and CRA,” Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance, vol. 4, no. 1, 2025. doi: 10.60097/ACIG/211823.

[7] M. Fargnoli, L. Murgianu, and M. Tronci, “The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) Application in the Healthcare Sector: Lessons Learned from Two Case Studies on Medical Device Management,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 20, Art. no. 9495, 2024. doi: 10.3390/app14209495.

[8] S. R. Grandhi and J. D. Still, “Deciphering Human Error: Improving Cybersecurity Reporting,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 234-239, 2025. doi: 10.1177/10711813251358790.

[9] D. A. Wiegmann, L. J. Wood, T. N. Cohen, and S. A. Shappell, “Understanding the Swiss cheese model and its application to patient safety,” Journal of Patient Safety, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119-123, 2022. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514562/

[10] T. Ye. Gura, O. O. Gura, L. A. Chernikova, and O. I. Gura, “Peculiarities of Onboarding in Modern IT Projects,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 357-374, 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v87i1.4682.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ievgenii Lysenko. (2026). Evolution of the IT Project Manager’s Role under Hyperautomation of Corporate Processes. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 57(1), 290-299. https://www.ijcjournal.org/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/view/2534