Development of Quality Assurance Standards for the Industrialization of Software Applications Prototyped Using Intelligent Assistants

Authors

  • Andrii Shaliev

Keywords:

quality assurance, generative AI, software industrialization, intelligent assistants, test-driven generation, knowledge grounding, program repair, autonomous agents, software governance

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of quality assurance transformation in the context of industrializing software applications prototyped using intelligent assistants. The relevance of the study is determined by the rapid diffusion of large language models into software development workflows and the growing mismatch between accelerated prototyping and delayed quality degradation in production environments. Scientific novelty lies in the analytical reinterpretation of quality assurance as a layered, distributed regulatory system rather than a terminal verification phase. The work describes structural shifts in assurance logic, including constraint-driven generation, embedded testing, knowledge grounding, and orchestration-level governance. Special attention is paid to the temporal displacement of quality signals and the limitations of metric-centered evaluation in AI-assisted development. The work sets itself the goal of conceptualizing quality assurance standards suitable for the industrialization of AI-prototyped software. To achieve this goal, analytical synthesis and comparative analysis are used. A corpus of recent studies on generative AI, program repair, knowledge-enhanced systems, autonomous agents, and software quality tools is examined. The conclusions demonstrate that no single assurance paradigm stabilizes quality under AI augmentation, and layered standards emerge as a structural necessity. The article will be useful for researchers, software architects, quality engineers, and technology managers.

Author Biography

  • Andrii Shaliev

    Senior Delivery Director, Client Partnership and Growth @ Trinetix Inc,Nashville, TN, USA

References

[1]. Yu, L., Alégroth, E., Chatzipetrou, P., et al. (2026). Evaluating the quality of GenAI applications in software engineering: A multi-case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 31(29). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10759-2

[2]. Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., et al. (2024). A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18, 186345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1

[3]. Zubair, F., Al-Hitmi, M., & Catal, C. (2025). The use of large language models for program repair. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 93, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2024.103951

[4]. Liu, J., Liang, R., Zhu, X., et al. (2025). LLM4TDG: Test-driven generation of large language models based on enhanced constraint reasoning. Cybersecurity, 8(32). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-024-00335-4

[5]. Yang, W., Some, L., Bain, M., & Kang, B. (2025). A comprehensive survey on integrating large language models with knowledge-based methods. Knowledge-Based Systems, 318, 113503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113503

[6]. Sauvola, J., Tarkoma, S., Klemettinen, M., et al. (2024). Future of software development with generative AI. Automated Software Engineering, 31(26). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-024-00426-z

[7]. Quaranta, L., Calefato, F., & Lanubile, F. (2024). Pynblint: A quality assurance tool to improve the quality of Python Jupyter notebooks. SoftwareX, 28, 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101959

[8]. Neyem, A., Rios-Letelier, A., Céspedes-Arancibia, K., Sandoval Alcocer, J. P., & Mendoza, M. (2024). Enhancing commit message quality in software capstone projects with generative AI. SoftwareX, 28, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101947

[9]. Wen, H., Wang, S., Liang, X., Li, B., Hu, W., & Luo, X. (2025). Version 5.4.18 – AI–KM: Knowledge enhancement with RAG and workflow. SoftwareX, 31, 102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2025.102349

[10]. Kessel, M., & Atkinson, C. (2024). Promoting open science in test-driven software experiments. Journal of Systems and Software, 212, 111971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.111971

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Andrii Shaliev. (2026). Development of Quality Assurance Standards for the Industrialization of Software Applications Prototyped Using Intelligent Assistants. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 57(1), 152-162. https://www.ijcjournal.org/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/view/2511