Classification of Students Based on Academic Ability Using Profile Matching and Linear Interpolation Weighting
Keywords:
DSS, Clustering, Profile Matching, Academic Ability, Linear Interpolation.Abstract
Higher education institutions play an important role in learning activities, both academic and non-academic, including establishing a social transition to adjust to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). Higher education in Indonesia is generally divided into classes with heterogeneous characteristics that cause less conducive teaching and learning process. Clustering of students in a particular group (homogeneous) is expected to improve acceleration and effectiveness of learning. Multicriteria analysis needs to be done to avoid errors of judgment in the determination of the class. Selection methods may affect the quality of the resulting decisions. This research profile matching method applying in determining the clustering of students, which is assessed based on the ideal profile of a superior class. The criteria that form the basis of assessment is the value of two semesters learning achievement in the first year, the value of the course, the expertise, and mastery of programming languages as well as activity in the organization's activities. Weighting difference in value (gap) with a certain range is calculated using linear interpolation. Output in the form of a ranking system that helps decision-makers to the cluster of students accurately and efficiently.
References
N. W. Gleason, Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2018.
N. W. Gleason, “Singapore’s Higher Education Systems in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Preparing Lifelong Learners,” in Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 2018.
H. B. Wicaksono and A. Dores, “International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing Student Aspects Monitoring Using Profile Matching,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 93–100, 2018.
N. A. Sari, B. Widada, and T. Susyanto, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Framework Laravel,” Script, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2015.
S. O. Adodo and J. O. Abgayewa, “Effect of homogenous and heterogeneous ability grouping class teaching on students interest, attitude and achievement in integrated science,” Int. J. Psychol. Couns., 2011.
M. Bahar, “Student Perception of Shift from Homogenous Grouping to Heterogeneous Grouping at a University Class,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2012.
J. A. Riordan, “Perceptions of secondary school teachers in regard to heterogeneous and homogeneous grouping practices,” 1994.
L. Uusitalo, A. Lehikoinen, I. Helle, and K. Myrberg, “An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 63, pp. 24–31, 2015.
M. E. Borsuk, C. A. Stow, and K. H. Reckhow, “A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis,” Ecol. Modell., 2004.
N. Fenton and M. Neil, Risk assessment and decision analysis with bayesian networks. 2012.
A. Holzkämper, V. Kumar, B. W. J. Surridge, A. Paetzold, and D. N. Lerner, “Bringing diverse knowledge sources together - A meta-model for supporting integrated catchment management,” J. Environ. Manage., 2012.
Oktopanda, “A Study Approach of Decision Support System with Profile Matching,” Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res., vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 31–44, 2017.
T. V Avdeenko and E. S. Makarova, “The case-based decision support system in the field of IT- consulting,” Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Bus. Ind., pp. 1–6, 2016.
T. V Avdeenko and E. S. Makarova, “Integration of Case-based and Rule-based Reasoning Through Fuzzy Inference in Decision Support Systems Integration of case-based and rule-based reasoning through fuzzy inference in decision support systems,” Procedia - Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 103, no. February, pp. 447–453, 2017.
E. Faizal and H. Hamdani, “Weighted Minkowski similarity method with CBR for diagnosing cardiovascular disease,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 12, 2018.
A. Ishizaka and S. Siraj, “Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 462–471, 2018.
P. L. Drnevich, T. H. Brush, and A. Chaturvedi, “Examining the Implications of Process and Choice for Strategic Decision Making Effectiveness,” Cris. Manag., vol. 17, pp. 344–359, 2013.
B. W. Sari, “Perbandingan Metode Profile Matching dan Simple Additive Weighting Pada Penentuan Jurusan Siswa Kelas X SMA N 2 Ngaglik,” J. Ilm. DASI, 2015.
C. H. Primasari, R. Wardoyo, and A. K. Sari, “Integrated AHP, Profile Matching, and TOPSIS for selecting type of goats based on environmental and financial criteria,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 28, 2018.
H. Mustafidah and H. N. Hadyan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product ( WP ) ( Decision Support System of Excellent Student Determination in Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto Using Weighted,” Juita, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2017.
T. Susilowati, E. Y. Anggraeni, Fauzi, W. Andewi, Y. Handayani, and A. Maseleno, “Using Profile Matching Method to Employee Position Movement,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
